JLA Vol:14 Iss:1 (Multiple reflection and its influence on keyhole evolution)
Product Code: JLA_14_1_39
$28.00 (USD)
Members: $25.00 (USD)
People who purchased this product have also purchased these products:
- ICALEO 2009 Paper #704 (Spatter Formation and Keyhole Observation with High Speed Cameras – Better Understanding of the Keyhole Formation)
- ICALEO 2008 Paper #M607 (Laser Cutting for Medical Device (Stent) - Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow (Invited Presentation - 40 Minutes))
- ICALEO 2008 Paper #704 (Fundamental Understanding of Spatter Behavior at Laser Welding of Steel)
- ICALEO 2007 Paper #M303 (Micromachining Performance Comparison Between a Pulsed Nd: YAG Laser and a Single Mode Fiber Laser Up to 100W Average Power)
- ICALEO 2007 Paper #208 (Welding and Cutting of Copper with High Brightness Lasers)
Authors:
Hyungson Ki
Pravansu S. Mohanty
Jyotirmoy Mazumder
Center for Laser Aided Intelligent Manufacturing, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2125
In laser drilling and keyhole welding, multiple reflection phenomena determine how the energy is transferred from the laser beam to the workpiece, and, most importantly, all other physics such as fluid flow, heat transfer, and the cavity shape itself depend on these phenomena. In this study, a multiple reflection model inside a self-consistent (or self-evolving) cavity has been developed based on the level set method and ray tracing technique. In the case of drilling, it is observed that the laser energy tends to concentrate near the center, where the effective intensity reaches a value two orders of magnitude higher than the original distribution. In keyhole welding, however, the maximum laser intensity is only around five times higher than the original during the entire process. Combined with the strong keyhole fluctuation, the redistributed intensity patterns are very dynamic. The intensity fluctuation drives the keyhole fluctuation, and the keyhole fluctuation, in turn, affects the intensity fluctuation. This study demonstrates that drill holes are highly efficient surfaces to focus a large amount of energy in a tiny area while keyholes have the capacity to evenly distribute the energy in a large area. It is also shown that multiple reflection phenomena are highly geometry dependent and a preassumed hole shape as adopted in many prior studies may lead to an inappropriate result. © 2002 Laser Institute of America.


